Skip to content

4 Comments

  1. Alberto
    February 21, 2016 @ 11:57 pm

    Hi,

    Amazing work analyzing the Laocoon. This piece kind of obsessed me for a long time but never though about it in terms of canon of design. This piece is been restored several times and as you might know already during Reinaissance they decided to add the three right arms which were missing at that time (also the Laocoon one). There was an interesting discusion about the right Laocoon arm about how it was posed originally and despite the Michelangelo opinion, who rightly said it was bended, the restoring artist (Jacopo Sansovino) opted for a more heroic extended arm. This is how it looked.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laoco%C3%B6n_and_His_Sons#/media/File:Laocoonphoto.jpg

    Which composition do you think is better in terms of canon of design?

    Best Reggards

    Alberto

  2. tavis
    February 22, 2016 @ 8:38 am

    Hi Alberto, that’s interesting, thanks for commenting and sending me the link. I hadn’t read about the debate on the arms. I think Michelangelo was correct in his thoughts. I’m studying anatomy at the moment and when I look at both versions, I think the balance of the figure and the anatomy works best with the bending arm. He’s being attacked by serpents, so I imagine he’d be trying to get them off of his back instead of striking a superman pose 😉 Just my take on it though. Overall I think the version in this article works best. The composition in the other image you linked has a couple of design concerns. The son on our right has his hand sticking upwards which breaks the movement…it draws a lot of attention because of the shape it creates too. Almost seems like the hand is a major focal point, when it shouldn’t be. Laocoon’s arm is better bent because it helps keep our eye’s circling around the sculpture instead of thrusting it up and outward…plus the balance issue. I do like the arm of the son on the left, though it might help with the movement circling around the sculpture if it were bent just a bit more…that is, if Laocoon’s arm was bent also.
    I hope that answers your question 🙂 Which one do you like the best? Thanks again for sharing!

  3. Alberto
    February 23, 2016 @ 6:51 am

    Hi Tavis,

    Many thanks for the comment, accordingly to wikipedia (not best source even but ey!) The actual pose of the arm is the right one. Somebody found the arm buried in Rome and they re-attached it to the Laocoon, so…Michelangelo was right in his analysis.
    I like more the bended arm and totally agree with your notes about why the bend arm fits better.

    All the best

  4. tavis
    February 23, 2016 @ 6:11 pm

    Hi Alberto, I enjoyed the additional history of the piece, thank you!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *